Here we introduce four canonical topologies imposed on function spaces of the form , where and are topological spaces. They are as follows: the uniform topology, the topology of compact convergence, the compact-open topology, and the pointwise convergence topology. Of these, the pointwise convergence and uniform topologies should be familiar from elementary analysis and topology, whereas the compact convergence and compact-open topology are relatively novel concepts. Furthermore, the uniform and compact convergence topologies require to be a metric space to be defined, while the compact-open and pointwise convergence topologies can be defined with general spaces and . As a final notational note, we use to denote the space of continuous functions from to .
We first enumerate their definitions, beginning with the compact-open and pointwise convergence topologies which don’t require to have a metric. If is a compact subset of and is an open subset of , let
The sets , as a subbasis, generates a topology on which we call the compact-open topology. Unlike the other three topologies, we typically only use the compact-open topology as defined in instead of the entire space . If is a point of and is an open subset of , let
The sets as a subbasis generates the pointwise convergence topology in . Note this is precisely the familiar product topology as where is the projection from onto the coordinate. It is called the pointwise convergence topology as a sequence converges to in this topology precisely when for each , converges to in .
To define the remaining two topologies we need to have a metric, which we denote by . For any arbitrary metric we denote the corresponding bounded metric as , where
The uniform topology is identical in the context of function spaces as it is in general product spaces, where it is generated by the uniform metric
In certain types of function spaces, we can alternatively obtain the uniform metric via the sup metric
and letting be the bounded metric of the sup metric as the notation suggests. I say “certain types” here because for the sup metric to be well-defined we need assumptions such as being compact. A sequence converges to in the uniform topology precisely when uniformly converges to . Consequently, from familiar results in analysis we can see that is closed in with the uniform topology (also recall that is not closed in the pointwise convergence topology). Let be a compact subset of . Given and , let
The sets form a basis over that generates the topology which we call the topology of compact convergence. We make the general observation that converges to under the compact convergence topology precisely when the restrictions uniformly for all compact subsets .
Although the pointwise convergence and uniform topologies are quite familiar and thus have straightforward properties, the compact-open and compact convergence topologies require more cautious consideration. We prove some general properties.
Theorem 1) Let be a space and be a metric space. For the function space , one has the following inclusions of topologies:
If is compact the first two coincide, and if is discrete the second two coincide.
Proof) Trivial.
The compact convergence topology is thus in between the uniform and pointwise convergence topologies in terms of fineness. It is, in fact, just the right amount of fineness for topological studies of function spaces as it preserves a lot of the clean properties of uniform convergence without being too restrictive. One of these is that the continuous function set is closed, under the mild assumption that is compactly generated. Recall is compactly generated if, whenever and is open in for all compact subsets of , is open in .
Theorem 2) Let be a compactly generated space and be a metric space. Then is closed in under the topology of compact convergence.
Proof) Assume that , and let be an arbitrary compact subset of . Then, for any we can choose some continuous function , such that uniformly converges to . We thus conclude that is continuous for all compact subsets . Then, for any open set , is open in for any compact subset , which implies is open in as is compactly generated. Thus, is continuous and we are done.
The one qualm we have about the topology of compact convergence is that it requires to have a metric structure, whereas we want as much generality as possible. The compact-open topology is precisely the solution to this issue, as it is a metric-independent topology that coincides with the compact convergence topology as long as we are working in .
Theorem 3) Let be a space and be a metric space. The compact-open topology and topology of compact convergence coincide on .
Proof) Note that the following discussion fully takes place in . We first prove that the compact convergence topology is finer than the compact-open topology. It suffices to show, for any compact subset and open set , is open in the compact convergence topology. Consider any element . As is continuous, is compact, and thus there is some such that the -neighborhood . Thus, the basis element of the compact convergence topology satisfies . We are done.
We now show the compact-open topology is finer than the compact convergence topology, which requires more precision. Let be an arbitrary basis element of the compact convergence topology, where is compact. For any , consider the ball in and the neighborhood of in . As is compact, there are finitely many such neighborhoods that cover . Now consider the compact sets ; as . Thus, the set is an open set in the compact-open topology that contains and is a subset of . We are done.
Theorem 4) Let be a metric space. The compact convergence topology on does not depend on the metric of . Therefore, if is compact, the uniform topology on does not depend on the metric of .
Proof) This is an immediate corollary of Theorem 3.
We show two more theorems that illustrate the usefulness of the compact-open topology.
Theorem 5) Let be locally compact Hausdorff; let have the compact-open topology. Then, the evaluation map defined as is continuous.
Proof) Recall that locally compact Hausdorff spaces are regular. Let be a neighborhood of in . By local compactness, there is a neighborhood and compact set such that ; as is Hausdorff, is closed. Now take a neighborhood of such that and ; is clearly compact. Thus, the neighborhood of in maps into , and we are done.
Given a function such that is continuous as a function on for any fixed , we can define a corresponding function such that . We call this the map of into induced by . Similarly, we can start from a map to obtain a function .
Theorem 6) Let , , and be spaces; give the compact-open topology. If is continuous, then so is the induced function . The converse holds if is locally compact Hausdorff.
Proof) Take any and an arbitrary basis element that contains . It suffices to obtain a neighborhood of that maps into . Consider the open set in with the subspace topology; the line . By the tube lemma, there must be a neighborhood of such that . This satisfies , as desired.
For the converse, the map can be represented as where is . is clearly continuous by hypothesis, and is continuous as is locally compact Hausdorff. We are done.