Munkres Topology

Given a finite , a -manifold is a second-countable topological space (i.e. Hausdorff with countable basis) such that each point has a neighborhood homeomorphic with an open set in .

We first explain some core terminology. The support of a map where is some topological space is defined to be the closure of . Furthermore, given a finite open cover of a space , a family of functions () is said to be a partition of unity dominated by if the support of is a subset of and if for all .

Theorem 1) Let be a finite open covering of a normal space . Then, there exists a partition of unity () dominated by .

Proof) For any finite open cover , we can find a “smaller” open cover such that . This is a simple explicit construction: is a closed subset of , and by normality there is some open such that and . Clearly, the new collection is still an open cover of . We do the same for , taking and some using normality such that and .

Using this construction, take a “smaller” cover of such that and then a “smaller” cover of such that . Using the Urysohn Lemma, we can create continuous functions such that and . Clearly, , and on . As is an open cover of , the function is a strictly positive continuous function defined on . Taking gives us our desired partition of unity.

Theorem 2) Every -manifold is regular and thus metrizable by Urysohn metrization.

Proof) The local Euclidean structure and Hausdorff condition is sufficient to show is regular; the local condition is particularly powerful as it allows us to use structure in .

Take an arbitrary point and neighborhood of ; it suffices to show there exists a neighborhood of such that . Let be a neighborhood of homeomorphic to an open subset of , and let ; then, is a neighborhood of contained in that is homeomorphic to an open subset of . Let be this imbedding and let , .

Consider an open ball about contained in such that ; this is possible as we are working in . Then, consider the set , which is a neighborhood about . Note that is compact, and thus is compact; we can invoke the fact that is Hausdorff to conclude is not only closed in but in the entire space . Thus, , and is precisely the neighborhood of that we desired. We are done.

Theorem 3) If is a compact -manifold, can be imbedded into some finite-dimensional Euclidean space .

Proof) Note that is Hausdorff and compact, and thus is normal. Using compactness, we can find a finite open cover of such that each is homeomorphic to an open set in . Let be the corresponding embedding. Using Theorem 1 and normality, construct a partition of unity dominated by . The core idea is that we can concatenate the “coordinates” to create an embedding of into Euclidean space, with the s acting as multipliers to smooth out the function to be continuous.

Define as when and when . These two parts of the definition agree on the open set and is continuous when restricted to either part; thus, is continuous. Taking , we define the map as follows, for any :

As is a continuous map from a compact space to a Hausdorff space , to show is an imbedding it suffices to prove the injectivity of . If with , there must be some such that , implying . must also satisfy , implying . Here, implies , which forces as is an imbedding. Thus, we are done.

Remarks: Note the s act as smooth functions on that pick up the “coordinate” of a point. Furthermore, note that in this proof we did not use the second-countability of -manifolds. It is possible to show any -manifold can be embedded into Euclidean space without compactness, but this requires considerably more machinery.